4.4 Article

The effect of marine oil-derived n-3 fatty acids on transepithelial calcium transport in Caco-2 cell models of healthy and inflamed intestines

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 281-288

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507201758

关键词

n-3 fatty acids; calcium absorption; Caco-2 cells; tumour necrosis factor-alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine oil-derived n-3 fatty acids have been shown to stimulate intestinal Ca absorption in animal studies, but the effects of such fatty acids on Ca absorption in human subjects are relatively unknown. In particular, n-3 fatty acids may be of therapeutic value for some Crohn's disease patients who experience Ca malabsorption. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of 20: 5n-3 and 22: 6n-3 on transepithelial Ca transport across monolayers of healthy Caco-2 cells as well as of TNF-alpha-treated Caco-2 cells (an in vitro model of Crohn's disease). Caco-2 cells were seeded onto permeable filter supports and allowed to differentiate into monolayers, which were treated with 80 mu M-20 : 5n-3, 80 mu M-22 : 6n-3, or 40 mu m-20 : 5n-3 + 40 mu m-22 : 6n-3 for 6 or 8 d, with or without co-treatment with TNF-alpha (10 ng/ml) (n 11 -15 monolayers per treatment). On day 16, transepithelial and transcellular transport of Ca-45 and fluorescein transport (a marker of paracellular diffusion) were measured. Treatment of healthy and inflamed Caco-2 cells with 20:5n-3, 22:6n-3 and both fatty acids combined for 8 d significantly (P < 0.005-0-01) increased total transepithelial Ca transport compared with that in control, effects which were mediated by an enhanced rate of transcellular Ca transport. The effects of n-3 fatty acids on Ca absorption after 6d were less clear-cut. In conclusion, the present in vitro findings highlight the need to investigate the effect of marine oil-based n-3 fatty acids on Ca absorption in vivo in studies of healthy human subjects as well as of Crohn's disease patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据