4.7 Article

Diversity and antibiotic resistance among nonvaccine serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage isolates in the post-heptavalent conjugate vaccine era

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 195, 期 3, 页码 347-352

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/510249

关键词

-

资金

  1. AHRQ HHS [R01 HS10247] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI066304, AI048935, AI48935] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC005855, DC005855] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [030662] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In response to the selective pressure of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, increased asymptomatic carriage of antibiotic-nonsusceptible nonvaccine serotypes (NVTs) has been observed. Possible mechanisms include de novo acquisition of resistance, serotype switching, introduction of new clones, and expansion of existing clones. Methods. To investigate the process of increased antibiotic nonsusceptibility among replacing serotypes, we applied multilocus sequence typing to samples of 126 and 222 pneumococci collected in 2001 and 2004, respectively, from the nasopharynges of children < 7 years of age in 16 Massachusetts communities. Results. We found no evidence of penicillin resistance due to either serotype switching or de novo acquisition. Nonetheless, resistance increased through the expansion of previously recognized clones of NVTs, particularly in serotypes 19A, 15A, and 35B. In 19A, several unrelated clones increased in frequency, whereas, in the other 2 serotypes, single resistant lineages were responsible for the increased prevalence of resistant strains. Conclusions. The decreased prevalence of antibiotic resistance with the introduction of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is likely to be partially eroded over time as vaccine-included serotypes are replaced by resistant clones of NVTs. The clinical significance of this will depend on the pathogenic potential of replacing clones to cause local (e.g., otitis media) or invasive disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据