4.6 Article

Enhancement of memory performance using doubly stacked Si-nanocrystal floating gates prepared by ion beam sputtering in UHV

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 359-362

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2006.888674

关键词

doubly stacked; ion beam sputtering (IBS); nonvolatile memory (NVM); Si nanocrystals (NCs); ultrahigh vacuum (UHV)

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [07-2501-906] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06A2802, 과06A1604] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structures of SiO2/SiOx/SiO2 and SiO2/SiOx/SiO2/SiOx/SiO2 have been prepared on Si wafers by ion beam sputtering deposition in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) and subsequently annealed to form single-laver and doubly stacked Si nanocrystals (NCs). Using these two structures, nonvolatile Si-NC floating-gate nMOSFETs were fabricated at x = 1.6 following 1.5-mu m CMOS standard procedures. The Fowler-Nordheim tunneling of the electrons through the tunnel oxide, their storage into NCs, retention, and endurance are all investigated by varying the device structure and the thicknesses of the NC and oxide layers. It is shown that charge-retention time is longer, and program/erase (P/E) speeds are faster in doubly stacked devices than in single-layer devices, which seem to result from the optimization of device structure, the exclusion of unwanted defects due to the nature of UHV, and the suppression of charge leakage by the multiple barriers/NC layers in the doubly stacked devices. It is also found that the threshold voltages in the endurance characteristics anomalously increase with the P/E cycles, more strongly in the doubly stacked NC memories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据