4.2 Article

Long-term outcome of anorectal malformations: the patient perspective

期刊

PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 97-102

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-006-1841-2

关键词

anorectal malformation; long-term outcome; psychosocial function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the long-term outcome of surgery for anorectal malformations (ARM) from the patient's perspective. One hundred and sixty seven children were operated for ARM between 1982 and 2000. Disease impact questionnaires to assess both clinical and psychological outcomes were sent to 137 eligible families. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 11.5. The response rate was 61% (n = 84). Sixty six percent had soiling. There was no significant difference in the incidence of soiling between genders or between the younger child and adolescent. Soiling was significantly increased in high (86%) and intermediate (79%) compared to low (43%) malformation (P = 0.001). Constipation was seen in 62% and abdominal pain in 49%, with no significant difference between malformation levels. Overall, 71% had associated anomalies. Although 44% had a documented urological abnormality, clinical significant problems were seen in only 30%. Eighty percent of the children had one or more behavioural problems and 15% expressed suicidal thoughts. ARM had a negative impact on the social life of the child in 52% and on family functioning in 50%. Soiling (P = 0.000), presence of associated anomalies (P = 0.001), constipation (P = 0.005), level of ARM (P = 0.015) and abdominal pain (P = 0.039) correlated significantly with psychosocial morbidity. Despite these findings, 62% of adolescents and 71% of children below 12 years with their parents reported above average global hopefulness score, remaining hopeful for the future. Children with ARM have ongoing physical and social morbidity, indicating the need for continuing multidisciplinary review and support to optimise their quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据