4.8 Article

Growth factor stimulation reduces residual quiescent chronic myelogenous leukemia progenitors remaining after imatinib treatment

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 1113-1120

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2014

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 95684] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [5M01 RR 00043] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate is highly effective in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) but fails to eliminate all leukemia cells. Residual leukemia stem and progenitor cells persist in imatinib-responsive patients and may be a potential source of relapse. previous studies indicate that imatinib preferentially targets dividing cells, and nondividing progenitor cells are resistant to imatinib-mediated apoptosis. We investigated whether growth factor stimulation of progenitor proliferation could reduce the number of residual nondividing cells remaining after imatinib treatment. CML and normal CD34(+) cells were labeled with 5-(and 6-)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to track cell division and cultured in low or high concentrations of growth factor to determine effects of growth factor stimulation on nondividing cells. High growth factor concentrations significantly enhanced CML proliferation with or without imatinib treatment and significantly reduced the number of viable, nondividing USE bright cells remaining after imatinib exposure. Stimulation with high growth factor before imatinib treatment further reduced the number of residual nondividing CML CD34(+) cells. Importantly, clinically achievable concentrations of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor alone or in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor also significantly reduced nondividing CML CD34(+) cells. These results support the potential efficacy of growth factor stimulation in reducing the residual leukemia progenitor population in imatinib-treated patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据