4.6 Article

Trends in maternal obesity incidence rates, demographic predictors, and health inequalities in 36 821 women over a 15-year period

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01180.x

关键词

incidence; obesity; pregnancy; rates; trends

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The aim of this study was to identify trends in maternal obesity incidence over time and to identify those women most at risk and potential-associated health inequalities. Design Longitudinal database study. Setting James Cook University Hospital maternity unit, Middlesbrough, UK. Sample A total of 36 821 women from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2004. Methods Trends in maternal obesity incidence over time were analysed using chi-square test for trend. Demographic predictor variables were analysed using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for confounding factors after testing for multicollinearity. National census data were used to place the regional data into the context of the general population. Main outcome measures Trends in maternal obesity incidence. Demographic predictor variables included ethnic group, age, parity, marital status, employment and socio-economic disadvantage. Results The proportion of obese women at the start of pregnancy has increased significantly over time from 9.9 to 16.0% (P < 0.01). This is best described by a quadratic model (P < 0.01) showing that the rate is accelerating; by 2010, the rate will have increased to 22% of this population if the trend continues. There is also a significant relationship with maternal obesity and mothers' residing in areas of most deprivation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.98, 3.02, P < 0.01), with increasing age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.05, P < 0.01), and parity (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.12, 1.21, P < 0.01). Conclusion The incidence of maternal obesity at the start of pregnancy is increasing and accelerating. Predictors of maternal obesity are associated with health inequalities, particularly socio-economic disadvantage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据