4.8 Article

Analysis of lagoon samples from different concentrated animal feeding operations for estrogens and estrogen conjugates

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 738-744

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es062234+

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) have been identified as potentially important sources for the release of estrogens into the environment, information is lacking on the concentrations of estrogens in whole lagoon effluents (including suspended solids) which are used for land application. Lagoons associated with swine, poultry, and cattle operations were sampled at three locations each for direct analysis for estrogens by GC/ MS/MS and estrogen conjugates by LC/MS/MS. Estrogen conjugates were also analyzed indirectly by first subjecting the same samples to enzyme hydrolysis. Solids from centrifuged samples were extracted for free estrogens to estimate total estrogen load. Total free estrogen levels (estrone, 17 alpha-estradiol, 17/beta-estradiol, estriol) were generally higher in swine primary (1000-21000 ng/L), followed by poultry primary (1800-4000 ng/L), dairy secondary (370550 ng/L), and beef secondary (22-24 ng/L) whole lagoon samples. Swine and poultry lagoons contained levels of 17 alpha-estradiol comparable to those of 17 beta-estradiol. Confirmed estrogen conjugates included estrone-3-sulfate (2-91 ng/ L), 17 beta-estradiol-3-sulfate (8-44 ng/L), 17 alpha-estradiol-3-sulfate (141-182 ng/L), and 17 beta-estradiol-17-sulfate (72-84 ng/L) in some lagoons. Enzymatic hydrolysis indicated the presence of additional unidentified estrogen conjugates not detected by the LC/MS/MS method. In most cases estrogen conjugates accounted for at least a third of the total estrogen equivalents. Collectively, these methods can be used to better determine estrogen loads from CAFO operations, and this research shows that estrogen conjugates contribute significantly to the overall estrogen load, even in different types of CAFO lagoons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据