4.8 Article

A biodegradable poly(ester amine) based on polycaprolactone and polyethylenimine as a gene carrier

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 735-744

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.028

关键词

gene delivery; degradable polymers; poly(ester amine)s; polycaprolactone; polyethylenimine

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2005-000-10087-0, 2005-01114, 2005-01400, 과C6A2206] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of research was to develop and optimize delivery systems for plasmid DNA (pDNA) based on biodegradable polymers, in particular, poly(ester amine)s (PEAs), suitable for non-viral gene therapy. Poly(ester amine)s were successfully synthesized by Michael addition reaction between polycaprolactone (PCL) diacrylate and low molecular weight polyethylenimine (PEI). PEA/DNA complexes showed effective and stable DNA condensation with the particle sizes below 200 nm, implicating its potential for intracellular delivery. PEAS showed controlled degradation and were essentially non-toxic in all three cells (293 T: Human kidney carcinoma, HepG2: Human hepatoblastoma and HeLa: Human cervix epithelial carcinoma cell lines) at higher doses in contrast to PEI 25 K. PEAS also revealed much higher transfection efficiencies in three cell lines as compared to PEI 25 K. The highest reporter gene expression was observed for PCL/PEI-1.2 (MW 1200) complex having transfection efficiency 15-25 folds higher than PEI 25 K in vitro. Also PEA/DNA complexes successfully transfected cells in vivo after aerosol administration than PEI 25 K. These PEAS can be used as most efficient polymeric vectors which provide a versatile platform for further investigation of structure property relationship along with the controlled degradation, significant low cytotoxicity and high transfection efficiency. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据