4.6 Article

Self-reported sleep quality is associated with the metabolic syndrome

期刊

SLEEP
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 219-223

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.2.219

关键词

metabolic syndrome; obesity; sleep quality; insulin resistance; Pittsburgh sleep quality index

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR-000056] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01-HL-40962] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To determine whether a simple, structured self-report of overall sleep quality is associated with the presence of the metabolic syndrome and its component risk factors. Design: An observational, cross-sectional study comparing global scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index with concurrently collected measures of the components of the metabolic syndrome and presence or absence of the syndrome. The metabolic syndrome criterion of the American Heart Association/National Heart, Blood, and Lung institute was adopted. Setting: University laboratory. Patients/Participants: Two hundred ten volunteers with a mean age of 46 years (57% men) screened for the presence of serious illness and related medications. Interventions: N/A. Measurements and Results: All analyses were adjusted for sex and age. Logistic regression showed that poor global sleep-quality scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were related significantly to the presence of the metabolic syndrome-an increase of the global sleep score of 2.6 points (approximately 1 SID) was associated with an odds of having the metabolic syndrome of 1.44 (p =.04, confidence interval = 1.01-2.06). Linear-regression results showed that the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index global sleep-quality score was related significantly to waist circumference, body mass index, percentage of body fat, serum levels of insulin and glucose, and estimated insulin resistance. Conclusions: Self-reported global sleep quality is significantly related to the metabolic syndrome and several of its core components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据