4.7 Article

Celecoxib and mucosal protection: Translation from an animal model to a phase I clinical trial of celecoxib, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 965-971

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0551

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA016056] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea occurs secondary to mucosal inflammation and may be cyclooxygenase-2 mediated. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may ameliorate chemotherapy-induced mucosal toxicity and enhance its antitumor effect. We investigated this hypothesis in the Ward colorectal cancer rat model and in a phase I clinical study. Experimental Design: In the Ward rat model, irinotecan was given daily x 3 or weekly x 4 with or without celecoxib. In the phase I clinical study, we planned to escalate the dose of irinotecan in the FOLFIRI regimen (irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) with a fixed dose of celecoxib. Irinotecan was escalated in four dose levels: 180, 200, 220, and 260 mg/m(2). Celecoxib was administered as 400 mg, twice daily starting on day 2 of cycle 1. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G were obtained on days 1 and 14. A standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme was used. Plasma concentrations of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Results: Celecoxib ameliorated diarrhea, weight loss, and lethality and resulted in synergistic antitumor effect in the rat model, Twelve patients with advanced cancers were enrolled and evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Diarrhea was the cause for discontinuation in one. Grade 2 and 3 diarrhea occurred in three and two patients, respectively. One patient had DLTat dose level 2 (grade 3 diarrhea). Two had a DLT at DL3 (G 3 emesis and myocardial infarct). Celecoxib had limited influence on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in this data set. Conclusions: Maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan in FOLFIRI schedule with celecoxib is 200 mg/m(2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据