4.5 Article

Urine concentrating defect in prostaglandin EP1-deficient mice

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 292, 期 2, 页码 F868-F875

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00183.2005

关键词

vasopressin; urine concentration; prostaglandin E(2); EP(1) receptor

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK37097] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the role of the prostaglandin E(2) ( PGE(2)) EP(1) receptor in modulating urine concentration as it is expressed along the renal collecting duct where argininevasopressin (AVP) exerts its anti-diuretic activity, and in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus where AVP is synthesized. The urine osmolality of EP(1)-null mice (EP(1)(-/-)) failed to match levels achieved by wild-type (WT) counterparts upon water deprivation (WD) for 24 h. This difference was reflected by higher plasma osmolality in WD EP(1)(-/-) mice. Along the collecting duct, the induction and subapical to plasma membrane translocation of the aquaporin-2 water channel in WD EP(1)(-)/(-) mice appeared equivalent to that of WD WT mice as determined by quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. However, medullary interstitial osmolalities dropped significantly in EP(1)(-/-) mice following WD. Furthermore, urinary AVP levels of WD EP(1)(-/-) mice were significantly lower than those of WD WT mice. This deficit could be traced back to a blunted induction of hypothalamic AVP mRNA expression in WD EP(1)(-/-) mice as determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Administration of the AVP mimetic [deamino-Cys(1), D-Arg(8)]-vasopressin restored a significant proportion of the urine concentrating ability of WD EP(1)(-/-) mice. When mice were water loaded to suppress endogenous AVP production, urine osmolalities increased equally for WT and EP(1)(-/-) mice. These data suggest that PGE2 modulates urine concentration by acting at EP(1) receptors, not in the collecting duct, but within the hypothalamus to promote AVP synthesis in response to acute WD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据