4.4 Article

Endogenous CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells have a limited role in the control of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 861-869

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01500-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI022070, R01 AI22070] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infection with the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi results in a robust and multifaceted immune response that controls parasite load but is unable to completely clear infection, resulting in parasite persistence and a chronic illness known as Chagas' disease in humans. The severity of Chagas' disease is correlated with persistent parasitism of muscle, neuronal, and gut tissues. The natural immunomodulatory function of endogenous CD4(+) CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Treg cells) to limit hyperactive immune responses may be exploited by microbes to persist despite host responses. In this study, we show that Treg cells are not necessary for T. cruzi evasion of immune responses during acute or chronic infection. In vivo anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody-mediated depletion of Treg cells from mice prior to challenge with a lethal strain or prior to and during acute infection with a nonlethal strain of parasite neither improved nor worsened the outcome of immune responses: differences in parasitemia, kinetics of antigen-specific CD8(+) T-cell expansion, and CD8(+) T-cell effector function (both in vivo and ex vivo) were of similar magnitudes for both depleted and control groups. Furthermore, depletion of CD25(+) cells from chronically infected mice did not enhance immune responses of muscle-derived CD8(+) T cells, nor could FoxP3 mRNA/scurfin-expressing leukocytes be isolated from muscle tissue. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that Treg cells do not appear to play a major role in regulating CD8(+) T-cell effector responses during the acute phase of infection or in the muscles of mice during chronic T. cruzi infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据