4.5 Article

Cyanidia (cyanidiales) population diversity and dynamics in an acid-sulfate-chloride spring in Yellowstone National Park

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 3-14

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00293.x

关键词

cyanidia; light; population dynamics; seasonal; short sequence repeats; temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unicellular eukaryotic algae Cyanidium, Galdieria, and Cyanidioschyzon (herein referred to as cyanidia) are the only photoautotrophs occurring in acidic (pH < 4.0) geothermal environments at temperatures above 40 degrees C. In Yellowstone National Park (YNP), we examined an annual event we refer to as mat decline, where cyanidial mats undergo a seasonably defined color fading. Monthly sampling of chemical, physical, and biological features revealed that spring aqueous chemistry was essentially invariant over the 1-year sampling period. However, multiple regression analysis suggested that a significant proportion of algal most probable number (MPN) count variation could be explained by water temperature and UV-visible (VIS) light exposure. Irradiance manipulations (filtering) were then coupled with (CO2)-C-14 incorporation experiments to directly demonstrate UV inhibition of photosynthesis. Population dynamics were also evident in 18S rDNA PCR clone libraries, which were different in composition at MPN maxima and minima, and again evident in PCR-amplified chloroplast genomic short sequence repeat (SSR) analysis. PCR-cloned SSRs of the YNP isolates and mats were very similar to Cyanidioschyzon merolae Luca, Taddei et Varano, although distance analysis could distinguish the YNP cyanidia from the genome sequenced C. merolae that was isolated in Italy. Unexpectedly, while phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA sequences and SSR sequences derived from YNP cyanidial mats and pure cultures suggested these algae are most closely related to C. merolae (99.7% identity), cell morphology was consistent with the genera Galdieria and Cyanidium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据