4.8 Article

Oxidative degradation of N-nitrosodimethylamine by conventional ozonation and the advanced oxidation process ozone/hydrogen peroxide

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 581-590

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.033

关键词

N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA); ozone; advanced oxidation; hydroxyl radical

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1903] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the oxidative degradation of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a probable human carcinogen, by conventional ozonation and the advanced oxidation process ozone/hydrogen peroxide (AOP O-3/H2O2). The rate constants of reactions of NDMA with ozone and hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot) were determined to be 0.052 +/- 0.0016 M-1 s(-1) and (4.5 +/- 0.21) x 10(8) M-1 s(-1), respectively. The experiments performed with buffered deionized water varying solution pH and employing H2O2 and HCO3- clearly showed that the reaction with (OH)-O-center dot dominates the NDMA oxidation during ozonation. Conventional ozonation with up to 160 mu M ( = 7.7 mg L-1) ozone led to less than 25% NDMA oxidation in natural waters. The AOP O-3/H2O2 required 160-320 mu M ozone ([O-3](0)/[H2O2](0) = 2:1) to achieve 50-75% NDMA oxidation. However, multiple injections of ozone of the same overall dose somewhat improved the oxidant utilization efficiency by minimizing (OH)-O-center dot scavenging contribution of oxidants. Methylamine (MA) was found to be a major amino product from NDMA oxidation initiated by (OH)-O-center dot. The mechanism of NDMA oxidation to MA is discussed based on the results obtained in this study and the previous literature. Bromate formation may be the limiting factor for NDMA oxidation during ozonation and ozone-based AOPs in bromide-containing waters. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据