4.3 Article

Fitness and extra-group reproduction in male Verreaux's sifaka: An analysis of reproductive success from 1989-1999

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 132, 期 2, 页码 267-277

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20507

关键词

lemur; Propithecus; mating systems; fitness components

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult males in social groups often compete with other male group members for access to adult females. In some primate species, males also seek mating opportunities in neighboring social groups. Such extragroup fertilizations (EGFs) provide an additional source of variation in male fitness. This additional component of fitness provided by EGFs must be incorporated into analyses that investigate sources of variation in male lifetime reproductive success. In this study, a model is analyzed in which male fitness over a 10-year sample period is decomposed into additive and multiplicative variance and covariance components. The data come from an ongoing study of a wild population of Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) located at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Southwest Madagascar. Paternity and demographic data for 134 males are used to decompose male fitness into the following three multiplicative components: reproductive lifespan during sample period, fertility, and offspring survival. These multiplicative components are estimated for males reproducing within their resident groups plus (i.e., the additive portion) for males reproducing in neighboring social groups. The analysis shows that variation in fertility makes the largest contribution to variation in total fitness, followed by variation in amount of time spent in sample period (which is a proxy of total reproductive lifespan) and variation in offspring survival. EGFs contribute an important source of variation to male fitness, and numerous factors enhance the opportunities for EGFs in male sifaka. These include female choice, a high degree of home range overlap, and a limited mating season.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据