4.6 Article

Commensal bacteria exacerbate intestinal inflammation but are not essential for the development of murine ileitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 178, 期 3, 页码 1809-1818

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.1809

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-55812, DK-44540, DK-42191, DK-67629] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pathogenesis of Crohn's disease has been associated with a dysregulated response of the mucosal immune system against intraluminal Ags of bacterial origin. In this study, we have investigated the effects of germfree (GF) conditions in the SANW1/YitFc murine model of Crohn's disease-like ileitis. We show that the bacterial flora is not essential for ileitis induction, because GF SAMEP1/YitFc mice develop chronic ileitis. However, compared with disease in specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice, ileitis in GF mice is significantly attenuated, and is associated with delayed lymphocytic infiltration and defective mucosal expression of Th2 cytokines. In addition, we demonstrate that stimulation with purified fecal Ags from SPF, but not GF mice leads to the generation of IL-4-secreting effector lymphocytes. This result suggests that commensal bacteria drive Th2 responses characteristic of the chronic phase of SAMP1/YitFe ileitis. Finally, adoptive transfer of CD4-positive cells from GF, but not SPF mice induces severe colitis in SCID recipients. These effects were associated with a decreased frequency of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes of GF mice compared with SPF mice, as well as lower relative gene expression of Foxp3 in CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in GF mice. It is therefore apparent that, in the. absence of live intraluminal bacteria, the regulatory component of the mucosal immune system is compromised. All together, our results indicate that in SAiMP1/YitFc mice, bacterial flora exacerbates intestinal inflammation, but is not essential for the generation of the chronic ileitis that is characteristic of these mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据