4.4 Article

Optimizing phase contrast in transmission electron microscopy with an electrostatic (Boersch) phase plate

期刊

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
卷 107, 期 2-3, 页码 213-226

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.07.006

关键词

phase contrast; Boersch phase plate; quarter-wave phase plate; electrostatic einzel lens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging of weak amplitude and phase objects, such as unstained vitrified biological samples, by conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) suffers from poor object contrast since the amplitude and phase of the scattered electron wave change only very little. In phase contrast light microscopy the imaging of weak phase objects is greatly enhanced by the use of a quarter-wave phase plate, which produces high signal contrast by shifting the phase of the scattered light. An analogous quarter-wave plate for the electron microscope, designed as an electrostatic einzel lens, was proposed by Boersch in 1947 but the small dimensions of the device have impeded its realization up to now. We here present the first fabrication and application of a miniaturized electrostatic einzel lens driven as TEM quarter-wave phase plate. Phase modulation is generated by the electrostatic field confined to the inside of a microstructured ring electrode. This field affects the phase velocity of the unscattered part of the electron wave. By varying its strength the phase shift of the primary beam can be adjusted to pi/2, producing strong phase contrast independent of spatial frequency. The phase plate proves to be mechanically stable and does not impair image quality, in particular it does not reduce the high-resolution signal. The expected residual lens effect of the einzel lens is minimal. Our microlens is supported by conducting rods arranged in a threefold symmetry. This particular geometry provides optimized single-sideband signal transfer for spatial frequencies otherwise obstructed by the supporting rods. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据