4.5 Article

Tendon collagen synthesis at rest and after exercise in women

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 541-546

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00797.2006

关键词

stable isotopic tracers; sex differences; tendon biopsy; estrogen; progesterone

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR-49869] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In general, there is a higher incidence of musculoskeletal injuries during physical activity in women than in men. We hypothesized that in women rates of tendon collagen synthesis would be lower than in men at rest and after exercise, especially in the later luteal phase when estrogen and progesterone concentrations are higher than the early follicular phase. We studied tendon collagen fractional synthesis rate (FSR) in 15 young, healthy female subjects in either the early follicular (n = 8) or the late luteal phase ( n = 7) 72 h after an acute bout of one-legged exercise (60 min kicking at 67% workload maximum) ( 72 h) and compared the results with those previously obtained for men. Samples were taken from the patellar tendon in both the exercised and rested legs to determine collagen FSR by the incorporation of [N-15] proline into tendon collagen hydroxyproline. There was no effect of menstrual phase on tendon collagen synthesis either at rest or after exercise. However, there was a significant difference between women and men at rest (women = 0.025 +/- 0.002%/ h, men = 0.045 +/- 0.008%/h; P < 0.05) and 72 h after exercise ( women = 0.027 +/- 0.005%/h; men = 0.058 +/- 0.008%/h). Furthermore, rest and 72-h tendon collagen synthesis were not different in women, whereas in men tendon collagen synthesis remained significantly elevated 72 h after exercise. It is concluded that both in the resting state and after exercise, tendon collagen FSR is lower in women than in men, which may contribute to a lower rate of tissue repair after exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据