4.6 Article

ESO imaging survey: optical DEEP Public Survey

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 462, 期 2, 页码 553-U168

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065030

关键词

catalogs; surveys; stars : general; galaxy : general; radio continuum : general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents new five passbands (UBVRI) optical wide-field imaging data accumulated as part of the DEEP Public Survey (DPS) carried out as a public survey by the ESO Imaging Survey (EIS) project. Out of the 3 square degrees originally proposed, the survey covers 2.75 square degrees, in at least one band (normally R), and 1.00 square degrees in five passbands. The median seeing, as measured in the final stacked images, is 0.97, ranging from 0.75 to 2.0. The median limiting magnitudes (AB system, 2 aperture, 5s detection limit) are U-AB = 25.65, B-AB = 25.54, V-AB = 25.18, R-AB = 24.8 and I-AB = 24.12 mag, consistent with those proposed in the original survey design. The paper describes the observations and data reduction using the EIS Data Reduction System and its associated EIS/MVM library. The quality of the individual images were inspected, bad images discarded and the remaining used to produce final image stacks in each passband, from which sources have been extracted. Finally, the scientific quality of these final images and associated catalogs was assessed qualitatively by visual inspection and quantitatively by comparison of statistical measures derived from these data with those of other authors as well as model predictions, and from direct comparison with the results obtained from the reduction of the same dataset using an independent (hands-on) software system. Finally to illustrate one application of this survey, the results of a preliminary effort to identify sub-mJy radio sources are reported. To the limiting magnitude reached in the R and I passbands the success rate ranges from 66 to 81% (depending on the fields). These data are publicly available at CDS***.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据