4.5 Article

Up-regulated PAR-2-mediated salivary secretion in mice deficient in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.113092

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protease-activated receptor-2 ( PAR-2) is expressed in the salivary glands and is expected to be a new target for the treatment of exocrine dysfunctions, such as dry mouth; however, the salivary secretory mechanism mediated by PAR-2 remains to be elucidated. Therefore, mechanism of the PAR-2-mediated salivary secretion was investigated in this study. We found that a PAR-2 agonist peptide, SLIGRL-OH, induced salivary flow in vivo and dose-dependent increase in [Ca2+](i) submandibular gland (SMG) acinar cells in wild-type ( WT) mice and mice lacking M-3 or both M-1 and M-3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), whereas secretions in PAR-2 knockout ( PAR-2KO) mice were completely abolished. The saliva composition secreted by SLIGRL-OH was similar to that secreted by mAChR stimulation. Ca2+ imaging in WT acinar cells and beta-galactosidase staining in PAR-2KO mice, in which the beta-galactosidase gene ( LacZ) was incorporated into the disrupted gene, revealed a nonubiquitous, sporadic distribution of PAR-2 in the SMG. Furthermore, compared with the secretion in WT mice, PAR-2-mediated salivary secretion and Ca2+ response were enhanced in mice lacking M-3 or both M-1 and M-3 mAChRs, in which mAChR- stimulated secretion and Ca2+ response in acinar cells were severely impaired. Although the mechanism underlying the enhanced PAR-2-mediated salivary secretion in M-3-deficient mice is not clear, the result suggests the presence of some compensatory mechanism involving PAR-2 in the salivary glands deficient in cholinergic activation. These results indicate that PAR-2 present in the salivary glands mediates Ca2+-dependent fluid secretion, demonstrating potential usefulness of PAR-2 as a target for dry mouth treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据