4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Advances in design and application of spiking neural networks

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 239-248

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-006-0065-7

关键词

spiking neurons; spike response model; integrate-and-fire model; dynamic synapse; evolutionary strategy; temporal coding; supervised learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents new findings in the design and application of biologically plausible neural networks based on spiking neuron models, which represent a more plausible model of real biological neurons where time is considered as an important feature for information encoding and processing in the brain. The design approach consists of an evolutionary strategy based supervised training algorithm, newly developed by the authors, and the use of different biologically plausible neuronal models. A dynamic synapse (DS) based neuron model, a biologically more detailed model, and the spike response model (SRM) are investigated in order to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach and to further our understanding of the computing capabilities of the nervous system. Unlike the conventional synapse, represented as a static entity with a fixed weight, employed in conventional and SRM-based neural networks, a DS is weightless and its strength changes upon the arrival of incoming input spikes. Therefore its efficacy depends on the temporal structure of the impinging spike trains. In the proposed approach, the training of the network free parameters is achieved using an evolutionary strategy where, instead of binary encoding, real values are used to encode the static and DS parameters which underlie the learning process. The results show that spiking neural networks based on both types of synapse are capable of learning non-linearly separable data by means of spatio-temporal encoding. Furthermore, a comparison of the obtained performance with classical neural networks (multi-layer perceptrons) is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据