4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Tumor origin of endothelial cells in human neuroblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 376-383

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0696

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Malignant cells are genetically unstable and prone to develop chemotherapy resistance, whereas tumor vasculature is usually of host origin and genetically stable. Tumor endothelial microvessels attract interest as therapeutic targets, but their genetic instability would curtail such approach. Here, we have investigated the tumor origin of endothelial microvessels in human neuroblastoma (NB). Materials and Methods Paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 10 MYCN-amplified tumors (six stage 4, three stage 3, and one stage 1) were studied. Endothelial cells (ECs) were detected by immunofluorescent staining for CD31 or CD105, and MYCN amplification was detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In xenografts of the HTLA-230 human NB cell line, human ECs were detected by CD31 staining, mouse ECs were detected by CD34 staining, and MYCN amplification and murine DNA were detected using FISH. Results MYCN-amplified ECs formed approximately 70% of tumor endothelial microvessels in two stage 4 tumors and 20% in one stage 3 tumor. Similar results were obtained after EC labeling with CD31 or CD105. Staining for alpha-smooth muscle actin in combination with MYCN FISH demonstrated that tumor-derived ECs were coated with pericytes. These vessels were functional because they contained RBCs. Approximately 70% of endothelial vessels from HTLA-230 xenografts stained for human CD31, but not murine CD34, and displayed MYCN amplification, thus proving their tumor origin. Conclusion NB-associated endothelial microvessels can originate from tumor cells, and this finding challenges the tenet that tumor vasculature is genetically stable. The possibility that NB-derived ECs are chemotherapy resistant warrants further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据