4.6 Article

Visualization of rodent brain tumor angiogenesis and effects of antiangiogenic treatment using 3D ΔR2-μMRA

期刊

ANGIOGENESIS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 785-793

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10456-013-9355-8

关键词

3D Delta R-2-mu MRA; Glioma; Angiogenesis; Anti-VEGF; Vascular imaging

资金

  1. National Research Program for Genomic Medicine, National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC100-2319-B-001-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding of structural and functional characteristics of the vascular microenvironment in gliomas and the impact of antiangiogenic treatments is essential for developing better therapeutic strategies. Although a number of methods exist in which this process can be studied experimentally, no single noninvasive test has the capacity to provide information concerning both microvascular function and morphology. The purpose of present study is to demonstrate the feasibility of using a novel three-dimensional Delta R-2-based microscopic magnetic resonance angiography (3D Delta R-2-mu MRA) technique for longitudinal imaging of tumor angiogenesis and monitoring the effects of antiangiogenic treatment in rodent brain tumor models. Using 3D Delta R-2-mu MRA, a generally consistent early pattern of vascular development in gliomas was revealed, in which a single feeding vessel was visualized first (arteriogenesis), followed by sprouting angiogenesis. Considerable variability of the tumor-associated vasculature was then noted at later stages of tumor evolution. Delta R-2-mu MRA revealed that anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment induced a rapid and significant alteration of the intratumoral angiogenic phenotype. In summary, 3D Delta R-2-mu MRA enables high-resolution visualization of tumor-associated vessels while simultaneously providing functional information on the tumor microvasculature. It can serve as a useful tool for monitoring both the temporal evolution of tumor angiogenesis and the impact of antiangiogenic therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据