4.6 Article

Sprouty4 regulates endothelial cell migration via modulating integrin β3 stability through c-Src

期刊

ANGIOGENESIS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 861-875

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10456-013-9361-x

关键词

Sprouty; c-Src; Integrins; Angiogenesis; Endothelial cell migration

资金

  1. NIH [R01 HL065301, P30RR030927/P30GM103392, R01 HL35627, R01 CA91645, R01 HL083151]
  2. Founders Affiliate of the American Heart Association
  3. Maine Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis is mediated by signaling through receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), Src family kinases and adhesion receptors such as integrins, yet the mechanism how these signaling pathways regulate one another remains incompletely understood. The RTK modulator, Sprouty4 (Spry4) inhibits endothelial cell functions and angiogenesis, but the mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. In this study, we demonstrate that Spry4 regulates angiogenesis in part by regulating endothelial cell migration. Overexpression of Spry4 in human endothelial cells inhibited migration and adhesion on vitronectin (VTN), whereas knockdown of Spry4 enhanced these behaviors. These activities were shown to be c-Src-dependent and Ras-independent. Spry4 disrupted the crosstalk between vascular endothelial growth factor-2 and integrin alpha V beta 3, the receptor for VTN. Spry4 overexpression resulted in decreased integrin beta 3 protein levels in a post-transcriptional manner in part by modulating its tyrosine phosphorylation by c-Src. Conversely, knockdown of Spry4 resulted in increased integrin beta 3 protein levels and tyrosine phosphorylation. Moreover, in vivo analysis revealed that Spry4 regulated integrin beta 3 levels in murine embryos and yolk sacs. Our findings identify an unanticipated role for Spry4 in regulating c-Src activity and integrin beta 3 protein levels, which contributes to the regulation of migration and adhesion of endothelial cells. Thus, targeting Spry4 may be exploited as a target in anti-angiogenesis therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据