4.6 Article

Soluble HSPB1 regulates VEGF-mediated angiogenesis through their direct interaction

期刊

ANGIOGENESIS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 229-242

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10456-012-9255-3

关键词

Heat shock protein 25/27 (HSPB1); Angiogenic balance; Vascular endothelial growth (VEGF); Endothelial cell (EC)

资金

  1. Nuclear Research and Development Program [M2AMA006]
  2. Basic Science Research Program [R1A4A002]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2011-0013364]
  4. Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0013364] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelial cell function is critical for angiogenic balance in both physiological and pathological conditions, such as wound healing and cancer, respectively. We report here that soluble heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1) is released primarily from endothelial cells (ECs), and plays a key role in regulating angiogenic balance via direct interaction with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF-mediated phosphorylation of intracellular HSPB1 inhibited the secretion of HSPB1 and their binding activity in ECs. Interestingly, co-culture of tumor ECs with tumor cells decreased HSPB1 secretion from tumor ECs, suggesting that inhibition of HSPB1 secretion allows VEGF to promote angiogenesis. Additionally, neutralization of HSPB1 in a primary mouse sarcoma model promoted tumor growth, indicating the anti-angiogenic role of soluble HSPB1. Overexpression of HSPB1 by HSPB1 adenovirus was sufficient to suppress lung metastases of CT26 colon carcinoma in vivo, while neutralization of HSPB1 promoted in vivo wound healing. While VEGF-induced regulation of angiogenesis has been studied extensively, these findings illustrate the key contribution of HSPB1-VEGF interactions in the balance between physiological and pathological angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据