4.6 Article

Analysis of PPARα-dependent and PPARα-independent transcript regulation following fenofibrate treatment of human endothelial cells

期刊

ANGIOGENESIS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 221-229

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10456-009-9142-8

关键词

Endothelial cells; Fenofibrate; PPAR alpha; Transcriptome network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fenofibrate is a synthetic ligand for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and has been widely used in the treatment of metabolic disorders, especially hyperlipemia, due to its lipid-lowering effect. The molecular mechanism of lipid-lowering is relatively well defined: an activated PPAR alpha forms a PPAR-RXR heterodimer and this regulates the transcription of genes involved in energy metabolism by binding to PPAR response elements in their promoter regions, so-called trans-activation. In addition, fenofibrate also has anti-inflammatory and anti-athrogenic effects in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. We have limited information about the anti-inflammatory mechanism of fenofibrate; however, trans-repression which suppresses production of inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules probably contributes to this mechanism. Furthermore, there are reports that fenofibrate affects endothelial cells in a PPAR alpha-independent manner. In order to identify PPAR alpha-dependently and PPAR alpha-independently regulated transcripts, we generated microarray data from human endothelial cells treated with fenofibrate, and with and without siRNA-mediated knock-down of PPAR alpha. We also constructed dynamic Bayesian transcriptome networks to reveal PPAR alpha-dependent and -independent pathways. Our transcriptome network analysis identified growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) as a hub gene having PPAR alpha-independently regulated transcripts as its direct downstream children. This result suggests that GDF15 may be PPAR alpha-independent master-regulator of fenofibrate action in human endothelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据