4.6 Article

GaBoDS: the Garching-Bonn deep survey IX. A sample of 158 shear-selected mass concentration candidates

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 462, 期 3, 页码 875-U46

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065955

关键词

cosmology : dark matter; galaxies : clusters : general; gravitational lensing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. The aim of the present work is the construction of a mass-selected galaxy cluster sample based on weak gravitational lensing methods. This sample will be subject to spectroscopic follow-up observations. Methods. We apply the mass aperture statistics (S-statistics) and a new derivative of it (the P- statistics) to 19 square degrees of high quality, single colour wide field imaging data obtained with the WFI@MPG/ESO 2.2 m telescope. For the statistics a family of filter functions is used that approximates the expected tangential radial shear profile and thus allows for the efficient detection of mass concentrations. The exact performance of the P-statistics still needs to be evaluated by means of simulations. Results. We find that the two samples of mass concentrations found with the P- and S-statistics have very similar properties. The overlap between them increases with the S/N of the detections made. In total, we present a combined list of 158 possible mass concentrations, which is the first time that such a large and blindly selected sample is published. 72 of the detections are associated with concentrations of bright galaxies. For about 22 of those we found spectra in the literature, indicating or proving that the galaxies seen are indeed spatially concentrated. 16 of those were previously known to be clusters or have meanwhile been secured as such. We currently follow-up a larger number of them spectroscopically to obtain deeper insight into their physical properties. The remaining 55% of the possible mass concentrations found are not associated with any optical light. We show that those dark detections are mostly due to noise, and appear preferentially in shallow data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据