4.8 Article

Sequence diversity at the proximal 14q32.1 SERPIN subcluster:: Evidence for natural selection favoring the pseudogenization of SERPINA2

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 587-598

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl187

关键词

natural selection; pseudogenization; SERPIN

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56670, R01 DK056670] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The superfamily of serine protease inhibitors (SERPINs) plays a key role in controlling the activity of proteinases in diverse biological processes. alpha 1-antitrypsin (SERPINA1), the most studied member of this family, is encoded by a gene located within the proximal 14q32.1 SERPIN subcluster, together with the highly homologous alpha 1-antitrypsin-like sequence (SERPINA2), which was previously proposed to be a pseudogene. Here, we performed a resequencing study encompassing both SERPINA1 and SERPINA2 as well as the adjacent gene coding for corticosteroid-binding globulin (SERPINA6) in samples from Europe and West Africa. In the African sample, we found that a common haplotype carrying a 2-kb deletion in the SERPINA2 gene is associated with remarkable long-range homozygozity as if it was quickly driven to high frequency by natural selection acting on an advantageous variant. An analysis of the HapMap Phase I data for the Yoruba sample confirmed that variation in this subcluster carries a strong signal of positive selection. We also show that the SERPINA2 gene is expressed and probably encodes a functional SERPIN. Finally, comparisons with orthologous sequences in nonhuman primates showed that SERPINA2 is present in some great apes, but in chimpanzees it was lost by a deletion event independent from that observed in humans. In agreement with the less is more hypothesis, we propose that loss of SERPINA2 is an ongoing process associated with a selective advantage during recent primate evolution, possibly because of a role in fertility or in host-pathogen interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据