4.8 Article

Super-resolution Geometric Barcoding for Multiplexed miRNA Profiling

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 57, 期 43, 页码 14075-14079

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201807956

关键词

DNA nanotechnology; DNA-PAINT; microRNA; multiplexing; super-resolution imaging

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's New Innovator Award [1DP2OD007292]
  2. NIH Transformative Research Award [1R01EB018659]
  3. NIH grant [5R21HD072481]
  4. Office of Naval Research (ONR) Young Investigator Program Award [N000141110914]
  5. ONR grants [N000141612410, N000141010827, N000141310593]
  6. National Science Foundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development Award [CCF1054898]
  7. NSF grant [CCF1162459]
  8. Wyss Institute for Biologically Engineering Faculty Startup Fund
  9. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R21HD072481] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB018659] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [DP2OD007292] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiles hold promise as biomarkers for diagnostics and prognosis of complex diseases. Herein, we report a super-resolution fluorescence imaging-based digital profiling method for specific, sensitive, and multiplexed detection of miRNAs. In particular, we applied the DNA-PAINT (point accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography) method to implement a super-resolution geometric barcoding scheme for multiplexed single-molecule miRNA capture and digital counting. Using synthetic DNA nanostructures as a programmable miRNA capture nano-array, we demonstrated high-specificity (single nucleotide mismatch discrimination), multiplexed (8-plex, 2 panels), and sensitive measurements on synthetic miRNA samples, as well as applied one 8-plex panel to measure endogenous miRNAs levels in total RNA extract from HeLa cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据