4.5 Article

Ovarian endocrine disruption underlies premature reproductive senescence following environmentally relevant chronic exposure to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 198-202

出版社

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.053991

关键词

aging; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; estradiol; menopause; ovary; pituitary; rat; reproduction; toxicology

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES012916] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) mediates the effects of many endocrine disruptors and contributes to the loss of fertility in polluted environments. While previous work has focused on mechanisms of short-term endocrine disruption and ovotoxicity in response to AHR ligands, we have shown recently that chronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induces premature reproductive senescence in female rats without depletion of ovarian follicular reserves. In the current study, premature reproductive senescence was induced using a ran e of low-dose exposure to TCDD (0, 1, 5, 50, and 200 ng kg(-1) wk(-1)) beginning in utero and continuing until the transition to reproductive senescence. Doses of 50 and 200 ng TCDD kg(-1) wk(-1) delayed the age at vaginal opening and accelerated the loss of normal reproductive cyclicity with age without depletion of follicular reserves. Serum estradiol concentrations were decreased in a dose-dependent fashion (>= 5 ng kg(-1) wk(-1)) across the estrous cycle in perisenescent rats still displaying normal cyclic vaginal cytology. Serum FSH, LH, and progesterone profiles were unchanged by TCDD. The loss of reproductive cyclicity following chronic exposure to TCDD was not accompanied by decreased responsiveness to GnRH. Ovarian endocrine disruption is the predominant functional change preceding the premature reproductive senescence induced by chronic exposure to low doses of the AHR-specific ligand TCDD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据