4.2 Article

A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort

期刊

ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 213-223

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004

关键词

malingering; effort; survey; neuropsychology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study investigated neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to assessing effort and malingering by surveying a sample of NAN professional members and fellows (n = 712). The results from 188 (26.4%) returned surveys indicated that 57% of respondents frequently included measures of effort when conducting a neuropsychological evaluation. While a majority of respondents (52%) rarely orneverprovide a warning that effort indicators will be administered, 27% of respondents often or always provide such a warning. The five most frequently used measures of effort or response bias were the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), MMPI-2 F-K ratio, MMPI-2 FBS, Rey 15-itern test, and the California Verbal Learning Test. However, the TOMM, Validity Indicator Profile, Word Memory Test, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and the Computerized Assessment of Response Bias were rated as most accurate for detecting suboptimal effort. These results and other findings are presented and discussed. (c) 2007 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据