3.8 Article

Intake and risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite from New Zealand foods and drinking water

期刊

FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 113-121

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02652030600934206

关键词

nitrite; nitrate; dietary intake; exogenous; endogenous; processed foods; vegetables; Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI); risk assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to excess nitrite is a potential health risk for humans. One hundred meat and processed foods and 100 vegetable samples purchased from New Zealand retail outlets were prepared as for consumption and analysed for nitrite and nitrate concentration using a standard, validated methodology. Nitrate concentrations ranged from less than the limit of detection (LOD = 5 mg kg(-1)) in cheddar cheese and cream cheese-based dips to 3420 mg kg(-1) in lettuce. Nitrite was detected in half the processed foods and meats analysed (levels up to 119 mg kg(-1)), but detected in only one vegetable sample above the LOD (broccoli at 27 mg kg(-1) nitrite). Concentration data were combined with 24 h dietary recall information to generate 4398 individual adult daily exposure scenarios for exogenous nitrite and nitrate including a contribution from water assessed from 1021 drinking water samples. The mean adult daily intake of exogenous nitrate and nitrite from food and water combined was 16 and 13% of the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI), respectively, and therefore should not pose a health risk for the average consumer. A maximally exposed New Zealand adult is estimated to have an intake of up to seven times the ADI for nitrate. When the endogenous conversion of nitrate to nitrite is taken into account, approximately 10% of people with an average rate of conversion and half of all people with a high rate of conversion are estimated to exceed the ADI. Either the ADI is inappropriate and needs to be re-evaluated, or those individuals who have a high rate of conversion of nitrate to nitrite are at risk to adverse effects of nitrite exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据