4.7 Article

Lipoprotein lipase mRNA expression in whole blood is a prognostic marker in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 204-212

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.076331

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by high individual variability in clinical course and the need for therapy. Differentiation of prognostic subgroups is based primarily on the mutation status of the genes for the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGHV). The time- and labor-intensive nature of this analysis necessitates the use of easily applicable surrogate markers. Methods: We developed a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method for determining lipoprotein lipase (LPL) mRNA expression and analyzed samples of lysed whole blood and CD19-selected cells from 50 CLL patients. Associations of LPL and ZAP70 [zeta-chain (TCR) associated protein kinase 70 kDa] expression with IGHV mutation status, overall survival (OS), and treatment-free survival (TFS) were investigated. Results: Lysed samples of whole blood and CD19-selected cells were similar with respect to LPL expression (R = 0.88; P < 0.0001). LPL expression was significantly associated with IGHV mutation status [chi(2)(1) = 15.3; P < 0.0001] and showed an 89.3% specificity, a 68.2% sensitivity, an 83.3% positive predictive value, and a 78.1% negative predictive value for IGHV mutation status. LPL expression was significantly associated with both OS and TFS in log-rank tests (both P values = 0.002). LPL-positive patients had a significantly shorter median TFS time (23 months) than LPL-negative patients (88 months) (P = 0.002). Conclusions: LPL mRNA expression is a valuable prognostic marker in CLL. The method does not require cell purification, and its applicability with archived samples facilitates its use in the clinical routine and other studies. (c) 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据