4.6 Article

Antarctic circumpolar current transport variability during 2003-05 from GRACE

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 230-244

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JPO3009.1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment ( GRACE) gravity data spanning January 2003 - November 2005 are used as proxies for ocean bottom pressure ( BP) averaged over 1 month, spherical Gaussian caps 500 km in radius, and along paths bracketing the Antarctic Circumpolar Current's various fronts. The GRACE BP signals are compared with those derived from the Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean ( ECCO) ocean modeling - assimilation system, and to a non-Boussinesq version of the Regional Ocean Model System ( ROMS). The discrepancy found between GRACE and the models is 1.7 cm(H2O) ( 1 cm(H2O) similar to 1 hPa), slightly lower than the 1.9 cm(H2O) estimated by the authors independently from propagation of GRACE errors. The northern signals are weak and uncorrelated among basins. The southern signals are strong, with a common seasonality. The seasonal cycle GRACE data observed in the Pacific and Indian Ocean sectors of the ACC are consistent, with annual and semiannual amplitudes of 3.6 and 0.6 cm(H2O) ( 1.1 and 0.6 cm(H2O) with ECCO), the average over the full southern path peaks ( stronger ACC) in the southern winter, on days of year 197 and 97 for the annual and semiannual components, respectively; the Atlantic Ocean annual peak is 20 days earlier. An approximate conversion factor of 3.1 Sv ( Sv equivalent to 106 m(3) s(-1)) of barotropic transport variability per cm(H2O) of BP change is estimated. Wind stress data time series from the Quick Scatterometer ( QuikSCAT), averaged monthly, zonally, and over the latitude band 40 degrees - 65 degrees S, are also constructed and subsampled at the same months as with the GRACE data. The annual and semiannual harmonics of the wind stress peak on days 198 and 82, respectively. A decreasing trend over the 3 yr is observed in the three data types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据