4.7 Article

Adolescents' reported consequences of having oral sex versus vaginal sex

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 119, 期 2, 页码 229-236

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1727

关键词

adolescence; gender; sexual behavior; risk-taking; decision-making

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD41349] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [T32 MH019391] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. The present study examined whether adolescents' initial consequences of sexual activity differ according to type of sexual activity and gender. METHODS. Surveys were administered to 618 adolescents recruited from 2 public high schools in the autumn of ninth grade ( 2002) and at 6-month intervals until the spring of tenth grade ( 2004). Analyses were limited to the 275 adolescents (44%) who reported engaging in oral sex and/or vaginal sex at any assessment. Participants were 14 years of age at study entry, 56% female, and of diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. RESULTS. In comparison with adolescents who engaged in oral sex and/or vaginal sex, adolescents who engaged only in oral sex were less likely to report experiencing a pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection, feeling guilty or used, having their relationship become worse, and getting into trouble with their parents as a result of sex. Adolescents who engaged only in oral sex were also less likely to report experiencing pleasure, feeling good about themselves, and having their relationship become better as a result of sex. Boys were more likely than girls to report feeling good about themselves, experiencing popularity, and experiencing a pregnancy or sexually transmitted infection as a result of sex, whereas girls were more likely than boys to report feeling bad about themselves and feeling used. CONCLUSIONS. Adolescents experience a range of social and emotional consequences after having sex. Our findings have implications for clinical practice and public health campaigns targeted toward youth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据