4.5 Article

TNFα and TNF receptor 1 expression in the mixed neuronal-glial cultures of hippocampal dentate gyrus exposed to glutamate or trimethyltin

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1131, 期 1, 页码 17-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.095

关键词

TNF alpha; TNFR1; excitotoxicity; trimethyltin; dentate granule neuron; cell culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined the expression and cellular localization of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) and its type 1 receptor (TNFR1) in mixed neuronal-glial cultures of rat hippocampal dentate gyrus exposed to glutamate (GLU) or trimethyltin (TMT). Our previous studies demonstrated that both pathogenic factors evoked neuronal apoptosis, however, TMT was more potent and caused cell death in almost 90% of neurons. Observed neurodegeneration was accompanied by morphological changes of microglia. In the current study, using RT-PCR and Western blotting analysis, we found that GLU and TMT induced increase in TNFa mRNA and protein levels. The induction of transcription was stronger following GLU treatment, however the protein production was much more intensive after TMT exposure. Double fluorescent labeling for TNFa, TNFR1 and cellular markers revealed cytokine expression in microglia and some neurons. On the other hand, majority of neuronal cells displayed TNFR1 immunoreactivity, in control and in treated cultures. Moreover, TMT led to a strong increase in TNFR1 expression in astrocytes, which displayed remarkable, granular staining for the cytokine receptor. Western blotting for TNFR1 revealed enhanced protein expression only in cultures treated with TMT. This is the first report demonstrating the changes of expression of TNFa and TNFR1 in hippocampal dentate gyrus cultures treated with GLU or TMT. Our results indicate that TNFa may be involved in the mechanism of neurotoxic effects evoked by both pathogenic factors and suggest that astrocytes via TNFR1 may enhance TMT-induced injury. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据