4.4 Article

Disconnection between activation and desensitization of autonomic nicotinic receptors by nicotine and cotinine

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 413, 期 1, 页码 68-71

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.028

关键词

acetylcholine receptors; desensitization; ganglionic nicotinic receptors; mean arterial blood pressure; nicotine metabolites

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cotimine is the major metabolite of nicotine in humans, and the substance greatly outlasts the presence of nicotine in the body. Recently, cotinme has been shown to exert pharmacological properties of its own that include potential cognition enhancement, anti-psychotic activity, and cytoprotection. Since the metabolite is generally less potent than nicotine in vivo, we considered whether part of cotinine's efficacy could be related to a reduced ability to desensitize nicotinic receptors as compared with nicotine. Rats freely moving in their home cages were instrumented to allow ongoing measurement of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). The ganglionic stimulant dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP) maximally increased MAP by 25 mmHg. Slow (20 min) i.v. infusion of nicotine (0.25-1 mu mol) produced no change in resting MAP, but the pressor response to subsequent injection of DMPP was significantly attenuated in a dose-dependent manner by up to 51%. Pre-infusion of equivalent doses of cotinine produced the same maximal degree of inhibition of the response to DMPR Discrete i.v. injections of nicotine also produced a dose dependent increase in MAP of up to 43 mmHg after the highest tolerated dose. In contrast, injection of cotinine produced no significant change in MAP up to 13 times the highest dose of nicotine. These results illustrate the disconnection between nicotinic receptor activation and receptor desensitization, and they suggest that cotinine's pharmacological actions are either mediated through partial-desensitization, or through non-ganglionic subtypes of nicotinic receptors. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据