4.7 Article

The star formation history of the Virgo early-type galaxy NGC 4435:: The Spitzer mid-infrared view

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 656, 期 1, 页码 206-216

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/510147

关键词

galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (NGC 4435); galaxies : stellar content

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a population synthesis study of NGC 4435, an early-type Virgo galaxy interacting with NGC 4438. We combine new spectroscopic observations obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope IRS instrument with IRAC archival data and broadband data from the literature. The IRS spectrum shows prominent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features, low-ionization emission lines, and H-2 rotational lines arising from the dusty circumnuclear disk characterizing this galaxy. The central spectral energy distribution ( SED), from X-ray to radio, is well fitted by a model of an exponential burst superimposed on an old simple stellar population. From the lack of high-excitation nebular lines, the [Ne III] lambda 15.5/[Ne II] lambda 12.8 ratio, the temperature of molecular hydrogen, and the fit to the full X-ray-to-radio SED we argue that the present activity of the galaxy is driven by star formation alone. The active galactic nucleus contribution to the ionizing flux is constrained to be less than 2%. The age of the burst is found to be around 190 Myr, and this is fully consistent with the notion that the star formation process was triggered by the interaction with NGC 4438. The mass involved in the rejuvenation episode turns out to be less than 1.5% of the stellar galaxy mass sampled in a 500 central aperture. This is enough to render NGC 4435 closely similar to a typical interacting early-type galaxy with inverted Ca II [H+K] lines that will later turn into a typical cluster E+A galaxy and reinforces the notion that these objects are the result of a recent rejuvenation episode rather than a genuine delayed formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据