4.7 Article

Numerical modeling of particle fluidization behavior in a rotating fluidized bed

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 2, 页码 106-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.08.021

关键词

rotating fluidized bed; numerical simulation; discrete element method; computational fluid dynamics; particle fluidization behavior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, numerical modeling of particle fluidization behaviors in a rotating fluidized bed (RFB) was conducted. The proposed numerical model was based on a DEM (Discrete Element Method)-CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) coupling model. Fluid motion was calculated two-dimensionally by solving the local averaged basic equations. Particle motion was calculated two-dimensionally by the DEM. Calculation of fluid motion by the CFD and particle motion by the DEM were simultaneously conducted in the present model. Geldart group B particles (diameter and particle density were 0.5 mm and 918 kg/m(3), respectively) were used for both calculation and experiment. First of all, visualization of particle fluidization behaviors in a RFB was conducted. The calculated particle fluidization behaviors by our proposed numerical model, such as the formation, growth and eruption of bubble and particle circulation, showed good agreement with the actual fluidization behaviors, which were observed by a high-speed video camera. The estimated results of the minimum fluidization velocity (U-mf) and the bed pressure drop at fluidization condition (Delta P-f) by our proposed model and other available analytical models in literatures were also compared with the experimental results. It was found that our proposed model based on the DEM-CFD coupling model could predict the U-mf and Delta P-f with a high accuracy because our model precisely considered the local downward gravitational effect, while the other analytical models overpredicted the Delta P-f due to ignoring the gravitational effect. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据