4.7 Article

An outbreak in an intensive care unit of a strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 239 associated with an increased rate of vascular access device-related bacteremia

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 493-501

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/511034

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Patients in intensive care units are at high risk of developing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. We report an epidemiological and bacterial genomic analysis of a 2-year outbreak in an intensive care unit of a variant of MRSA sequence type 239 ( hereafter designated TW). Methods. A cohort study was conducted to compare risk factors for MRSA bacteremia in patients who acquired TW versus patients who acquired non-TW strains of MRSA. Genetic analysis of TW was performed using multilocus sequence typing and microarray analysis. Results. Patients who acquired TW were more likely than patients who acquired non-TW strains of MRSA to have MRSA isolated from blood samples (47% vs. 13%;) and to have MRSA-positive vascular access P <.001 device-sample cultures (59% vs. 26%;), but less likely to have MRSA isolated from screening swab samples P <.001 ( 30% vs. 71%;). This increased rate of TW bacteremia was confined to the first week after acquisition of P <.001 TW infection. Using Cox regression analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio for bacteremia with TW was 4.5 times that of non-TW strains of MRSA (95% confidence interval, 2.25-9.00; P <.001). Microarray analysis revealed that TW P <.001 had accumulated all detectable mobile genetic elements that were variably expressed by other epidemic strains of MRSA sequence type 239 in the United Kingdom. Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first report to provide direct evidence that strains of MRSA can differ in their ability to cause bacteremia. Further genetic and in vitro analysis of the TW strain may provide insight into the mechanism of vascular access device-related bacteremia in the intensive care unit environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据