4.6 Article

Window Ca2+ current and its modulation by Ca2+ release in hypertrophied cardiac myocytes from dogs with chronic atrioventricular block

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 579, 期 1, 页码 147-160

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124222

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Torsades de pointes (TdP) ventricular tachycardia typically occurs in the setting of early afterdepolarizations; it contributes to arrhythmias and sudden death in congenital and acquired heart disease. Window L-type Ca2+ current (I-CaL) has a central role in the arrhythmogenesis and may be particularly important under beta-adrenergic stimulation. We studied the properties of I-CaL in myocytes from the dog with chronic atrioventricular block (cAVB) that has cardiac hypertrophy and an increased susceptibility to TdP. Peak I-CaL densities at baseline (K+- and Na+-free solutions, 10 mmol l(-1) [EGTA](pip)) in cAVB were comparable to control, but inactivation was shifted to the right, resulting in a larger window current area in cAVB. Under beta-adrenergic stimulation, the window current area was increased and shifted to the left, but less so in cAVB (maximum at -27 mV, versus -32 mV in control). I-CaL during a step to -35 mV showed a transient reduction immediately after the peak. Test steps to 0 mV, simultaneous recording of [Ca2+](i) and manipulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ release showed that this resulted from inhibition and fast recovery of I-CaL with SR Ca2+ release. The extent of this dynamic modulation was larger in cAVB than in control (23 +/- 2% of the initially available current, versus 13 +/- 3%; P < 0.05). Early afterdepolarizations (EADs) in cAVB myocytes under beta-adrenergic stimulation typically occurred in the window current voltage range and after decline of [Ca2+](i). In conclusion, in cAVB, the larger window current, its rightward shift and enhanced dynamic modulation by SR Ca2+ release may contribute to an increased incidence of EADs in cAVB under beta-adrenergic stimulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据