4.4 Article

Serum endostatin in the coronary circulation of patients with coronary heart disease and its relation to coronary collateral formation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 494-498

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.095

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of endostatin in coronary heart disease (CHD) is not well known. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of endostatin, an antiangiogenic growth factor, within the coronary circulation and to elucidate its relation to coronary collateral formation in patients with CHD. We recruited 72 subjects with suspected or previously diagnosed CHD. Blood samples from the left ventricular (LV) cavity and coronary sinus (CS) were obtained during coronary angiography, and the serum concentration of endostatin was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: the normal group (n = 15) defined as patients with atypical chest pain and no evidence of organic cardiac diseases and the CHD group (n = 57) defined as patients with >= 75% coronary stenosis at coronary angiography and chest pain on exertion. Endostatin in CS sera was significantly elevated in patients with CHD compared with normal subjects (median 79.7 [interquartile range 46.2 to 130.3] vs median 49.6 [interquartile range 29.1 to 84.5] ng/ml, p = 0.02). Spillover of endostatin (CS - LV value) from the coronary circulation in patients with CHD with severe stenosis was higher than in those with moderate stenosis (28.2 [4.8 to 48.61 vs 7.3 [-37.0 to 25.6] ng/ml, p = 0.01). In addition, endostatin production within the coronary circulation was higher in patients with poorly developed collaterals than in those with well-developed collaterals. In conclusion, endostatin is suggested to be produced from the coronary circulation in patients with CHD and may play an important role in the regulation of the growth of coronary collateral vessels. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据