4.8 Article

Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes

期刊

NATURE
卷 445, 期 7129, 页码 749-753

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature05532

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial ultrafiltration and dialysis membranes have broad pore size distributions and are over 1,000 times thicker than the molecules they are designed to separate, leading to poor size cutoff properties, filtrate loss within the membranes, and low transport rates(1,2). Nanofabricated membranes have great potential in molecular separation applications by offering more precise structural control(3,4), yet transport is also limited by micrometre-scale thicknesses(5). This limitation can be addressed by a new class of ultrathin nanostructured membranes where the membrane is roughly as thick (similar to 10 nm) as the molecules being separated, but membrane fragility and complex fabrication have prevented the use of ultrathin membranes for molecular separations(1). Here we report the development of an ultrathin porous nanocrystalline silicon (pnc-Si) membrane using straightforward silicon fabrication techniques that provide control over average pore sizes from approximately 5 nm to 25 nm. Our pnc-Si membranes can retain proteins while permitting the transport of small molecules at rates an order of magnitude faster than existing materials, separate differently sized proteins under physiological conditions, and separate similarly sized molecules carrying different charges. Despite being only 15 nm thick, pnc-Si membranes that are free-standing over 40,000 mu m(2) can support a full atmosphere of differential pressure without plastic deformation or fracture. By providing efficient, low-loss macromolecule separations, pnc-Si membranes are expected to enable a variety of new devices, including membrane-based chromatography systems and both analytical and preparative microfluidic systems that require highly efficient separations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据