4.7 Article

Lipid levels and the risk of ischemic stroke in women

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 68, 期 8, 页码 556-562

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000254472.41810.0d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA047988, CA-47988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL043851] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the association between total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio, and non-HDL-C with the risk of ischemic stroke in a large cohort of apparently healthy women. Methods: Prospective cohort study among 27,937 US women aged >= 45 years participating in the Women's Health Study who provided baseline blood samples. Stroke occurrence was self-reported and confirmed by medical record review. We categorized plasma lipid measurements into quintiles. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between lipids and risk of ischemic stroke. Results: During 11 years of follow-up, 282 ischemic strokes occurred. All lipid levels were strongly associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke in age-adjusted models. The association attenuated particularly for HDL-C after adjustment for potential confounders. For the comparison of the highest to the lowest quintile, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI; p for trend across mean quintile values) of ischemic stroke were 2.27 (1.43, 3.60; p(trend) < 0.001) for total cholesterol; 1.74 (1.14, 2.66; ptrend = 0.003) for LDL-C; 0.78 (0.52, 1.17; p(trend) = 0.27) for HDL-C; 1.65 (1.06, 2.58; p(trend) = 0.02) for the total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio; and 2.45 (1.54, 3.91; p(trend) < 0.001) for non-HDL-C. Conclusions: In this large cohort of apparently healthy women, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据