4.7 Article

Diffusional barrier in the unfolding of a small protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 366, 期 3, 页码 1016-1028

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.064

关键词

diffusional barrier; internal friction; bulk solvent viscosity; isostability condition; Kramers' theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine how the dynamics of the polypeptide chain in a protein molecule are coupled to the bulk solvent viscosity; the unfolding by urea of the small protein barstar was studied in the presence of two viscogens, xylose and glycerol. Thermodynamic studies of unfolding show that both viscogens. stabilize barstar by a preferential hydration mechanism, and that viscogen and urea act independently on protein stability. Kinetic studies of unfolding show that while the rate-limiting conformational change during unfolding is dependent on the bulk solvent viscosity, 9, its rate does not show an inverse dependence on eta, as expected by Kramers' theory. Instead, the rate is found to be inversely proportional to an effective viscosity, eta + xi where is an adjustable parameter which needs to be included in the rate equation. is found to have a value of -0.7 cP in xylose and -0.5 cP in glycerol, in the case of unfolding, at constant urea concentration as well as under isostability conditions. Hence, the unfolding protein chain does not experience the bulk solvent viscosity, but instead an effective solvent viscosity which is lower than the bulk solvent viscosity by either 0.7 cP or 0.5 cP. A second important result is the validation of the isostability assumption, commonly used in protein folding studies but hitherto untested, according to which if a certain concentration of urea can nullify the effect of a certain concentration of viscogen on stability then the same concentrations of urea and viscogen will also not perturb the free energy of activation of the unfolding of the protein. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据