期刊
TRANSPORT REVIEWS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 125-150出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01441640600843237
关键词
-
The Dutch government introduced a requirement in 2000 to evaluate proposed major infrastructure plans using a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) following published guidelines. Since then 13 new major infrastructure projects have been evaluated. The paper reviews the Dutch standardized CBA practice since 2000. The overall conclusion is that the use of standardized CBA has improved the quality of ex-ante evaluations of large infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. However, the relatively young CBA practice has not yet fulfilled its full potential. About half of the CBAs analysed can be considered as being suitable for helping decision-making. The other half has weaknesses with respect to methods and assumptions. Looking at the standardized CBA's influence on policy-making, the most important conclusion is that unfavourable CBA results have contributed to the postponement of decisions and to the downsizing of projects.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据