4.5 Article

A comparative analysis of the Lactuca and Helianthus (Asteraceae) plastid genomes:: Identification of divergent regions and categorization of shared repeats

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 302-312

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.3.302

关键词

Asteraceae; chloroplast DNA; comparative genomics; divergent sequence; genomic repeats; Helianthus annuus; Lactuca sativa; RNA editing

资金

  1. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [0946528] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have sequenced two complete chloroplast genomes in the Asteraceae, Helianthus annuus (sunflower), and Lactuca sativa (lettuce), which belong to the distantly related subfamilies, Asteroideae and Cichorioideae, respectively. The Helianthus chloroplast genome is 151 104 bp and the Lactuca genome is 152 772 bp long, which is within the usual size range for chloroplast genomes in flowering plants. When compared to tobacco, both genomes have two inversions: a large 22.8-kb inversion and a smaller 3.3-kb inversion nested within it. Pairwise sequence divergence across all genes, introns, and spacers in Helianthus and Lactuca has resulted in the discovery of new, fast-evolving DNA sequences for use in species-level phylogenetics, such as the trnY-rpoB, trnL-rpl32, and ndhC-trnV spacers. Analysis and categorization of shared repeats resulted in seven classes useful for future repeat studies: double tandem repeats, three or more tandem repeats, direct repeats dispersed in the genorne, repeats found in reverse complement orientation, hairpin loops, runs of A's orT's in excess of 12 bp, and gene or tRNA similarity. Results from BLAST searches of our genomic sequence against expressed sequence tag (EST) databases for both genomes produced eight likely RNA edited sites (C -> U changes). These detailed analyses in Asteraceae contribute to a broader understanding of plastid evolution across flowering plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据