4.6 Article

Being born small for gestational age increases the risk of severe pre-eclampsia

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01231.x

关键词

generation; population based; preeclampsia; SGA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The first aim of this study was to investigate the risk of pre-eclampsia, both mild and severe, in women born small for gestational age (SGA). The second aim was to investigate whether the risk is modified by pre-eclampsia in the previous generation. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting Sweden. Population A population of 118 634 women registered both as newborns and as mothers in the Swedish Medical Birth Register of 1973-2003. Of these, 6883 had been born SGA. Only primiparas and singletons were included. Methods The pregnancies that the women were born out of were analysed with regard to presence of pre-eclampsia, while their own pregnancies were analysed regarding age at delivery, smoking, body mass index and incidence of mild or severe pre-eclampsia. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used. In a first step, we adjusted for maternal characteristics, and in a second step, for pre-eclampsia in the previous generation. Main outcome measures Odds ratio for mild and severe pre-eclampsia. Results In women born SGA, the adjusted odds ratio (first step) for mild pre-eclampsia was 1.19 (95% CI 1.03-1.38), while for severe pre-eclampsia it was 1.69 (95% CI 1.40-2.02) compared with those not born SGA. After the second-step adjustment, the odds ratio for mild pre-eclampsia was 1.16 (95% CI 1.00-1.35) and for severe pre-eclampsia was 1.62 (95% CI 1.35-1.95). No statistically significant effect modification from pre-eclampsia in the previous generation was shown. Conclusions Women born SGA suffer a markedly increased risk of severe pre-eclampsia. Exposure to pre-eclampsia during a woman's own fetal development significantly increases her risk of pre-eclampsia but does not modify the SGA effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据