4.3 Article

Treatment with BX471, a nonpeptide CCR1 antagonist, protects mice against acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury by neutrophil recruitment

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 233-241

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31802e7598

关键词

acute respiratory distress syndrome; multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; systemic inflammatory response syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Chemokines and their receptors play a key role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis. BX471 is a potent nonpeptide CC chemokine receptor I antagonist in both human and mouse. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic and therapeutic treatment with BX471 on experimental acute pancreatitis in the mouse and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Methods: Acute pancreatitis was induced in mice by hourly intraperitoneal injection of cerulein. BX471 was administered either prophylactically or therapeutically, and pancreatic inflammation and lung injury were assessed. The expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1, P-selectin, and E-selectin was studied by reverse tran scriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Results: In cecrulein-induced acute pancreatitis, treatment with BX471 significantly protected mice against lung injury associated with cerulein-induced pancreatitis by attenuating myeloperoxidase activity, an indicator of neutrophil recruitment, and lung morphological changes in histological sections. Treatment with BX471 had little effect on pancreatic damage. Blocking CC chemokine receptor I by BX471 also down-regulated intercellular adhesion molecule 1, P-selectin, and E-selectin expression at mRNA and protein levels in both lungs and pancreas compared with vehicle-treated groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that interfering with neutrophil migration and activation by targeting CC chemokine receptor I may represent a promising strategy to prevent disease progression in acute pancreatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据