4.7 Article

Streptozotocin induces G2 arrest in skeletal muscle myoblasts and impairs muscle growth in vivo

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 292, 期 3, 页码 C1033-C1040

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00338.2006

关键词

satellite cell; diabetes; diabetic model; type 1 diabetes mellitus; cell cycle; proliferation; hypertrophy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptozotocin (STZ) is used extensively to induce pancreatic beta-cell death and ultimately diabetes mellitus in animal models. However, the direct effects of STZ on muscle are largely unknown. To delineate the effects of STZ from the effects of hypoinsulinemia/hyperglycemia, we injected young rats with 1) saline (control), 2) STZ (120 mg/kg) or 3) STZ and insulin (STZ-INS; to maintain euglycemia). STZ rats demonstrated significantly elevated blood glucose throughout the 48-h protocol, while control and STZ-INS rats were euglycemic. Body mass increased in control (13 +/- 4 g), decreased by 19 +/- 2 g in STZ and remained unchanged in STZ-INS rats (-0.3 +/- 2 g). Cross-sectional areas of gastrocnemius muscle fibers were smaller in STZ vs. control (1,480 +/- 149 vs. 1,870 +/- 40 mu m(2), respectively; P < 0.05) and insulin treatment did not rescue this defect (STZ-INS: 1,476 +/- 143 mu m(2)). Western blot analysis revealed a detectable increase in ubiquitinated proteins in the STZ skeletal muscles compared with control and STZ-INS. To further define the effects of STZ on skeletal muscle, independent of hyperglycemia, myoblasts were exposed to varying doses of STZ (0.25-3.0mg/ml) in vitro. Both acute and chronic exposures of STZ significantly impaired proliferative capacity in a dose-dependent manner. Within STZ-treated myoblasts, increased reactive oxygen species was associated with significant G(2)/M phase cell-cycle arrest. Taken together, our findings show that the effects of STZ are not beta-cell specific and reveal that STZ should not be used for studies examining diabetic myopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据